Strengths of the OECD-DAC data
Comprehensive: The data included here is fully comprehensive for what is defined as “Official Development Assistance”, and reporting to the database is mandatory for all 29 DAC member countries.
Less risk of double counting: Within the dataset itself, you don’t have to worry about double counting – ie. the same activity or event being counted more than once. This is a weakness of other aid datasets.
Validated/good quality: The data has been validated through the Development Cooperation Directorate, and via Peer Reviews (more information here)
Comparability: there are standard criteria (codes for sectors, types of aid, terms and conditions) – which are used universally, making the data comparable between donors, and over time
Historic: the data goes back as far as 1960 (in some cases; it’s not all complete)
Measuring against targets: the data is useful for measuring against commitment levels (eg. are donor countries meeting the 0.7% of GNI target?) – and, to a degree, sectoral targets, and geographical targets.
